Fold3 has announced a new collection of UK records:

The UK, London Gazette WWII Military Notices 1939-1945 contains 1.3 million indexed records for service members found in the Military Notice sections or supplements of the London Gazette newspaper.

The London Gazette is Britain’s oldest continuously published newspaper. It is the authoritative source of government news and publishes notices related to elections, Royal proclamations and other declarations, appointments to public office, and more. Issues of the Gazette also include notices on military matters. This new collection consists of a searchable index of service members and the awards or mentions they received in the Gazette during the WWII years of 1939-1945. These notices include military awards or commendations, reports of people leaving service due to illness, appointments, promotions, and other military matters.

Ordinary Seaman Bennett Southwell posthumously receives the George Cross

In some cases, the award notice also includes the story behind why the recipient received an award or commendation. The notices in this collection may contain information such as name, rank, regimental number, occupation, military dates of service, commendation dates, regiment, and unit. They provide clues to help unlock stories of bravery and sacrifice.

You can read a lot more about the new release in the Fold3 Blog at: https://blog.fold3.com/new-collection-of-military-notices-from-the-london-gazette/.

The following is a Plus Edition article written by and copyright by Dick Eastman.

I hope you are familiar with the warning, “Normal email is sent plain text and can be read by many different people when it is sent or when it is residing in the recipient’s in-box. Never send confidential information (such as credit card numbers or Social Security numbers) via normal email!” Network sniffers can spy on your email traffic. Using Secure Sockets helps, but there is no guarantee the recipient is taking the same precaution.

I would never send credit card information or stock brokerage account information or my Social Security Number or any other sensitive information in an e-mail message.

In fact, there has been a safe and secure method of sending sensitive information for years: encrypt the information before sending it. Of course, the recipient then will receive a message that is unreadable and must decrypt it in some manner before being able to read your message.

NOTE: I will point out that many years ago I spent my military service as a crypto technician. I spent at least eight hours a day encrypting and decrypting digital messages and voice traffic (telephone conversations, aircraft two-way transmissions, etc.). While that was more years ago than I care to admit, I have always maintained an interest in cryptology and have tried to keep up-to-date with the unclassified information available.

I have experimented with all sorts of encryption methods over the years. There are many to choose from, and almost all of them meet their objective of securing communications. However, most of them have been awkward to use and require technical expertise on both ends: both the sender and the recipient needed to know and understand the use of cryptology. 

So what do you do if you suddenly have a need to send sensitive information to someone else? Here are several suggestions. Pick one.

The remainder of this article is reserved for Plus Edition subscribers only. If you have a Plus Edition subscription, you may read the full article at: https://eogn.com/(*)-Plus-Edition-News-Articles/12970638.

If you are not yet a Plus Edition subscriber, you can learn more about such subscriptions and even upgrade to a Plus Edition subscription immediately at https://eogn.com/page-18077.

Nathan Dylan Goodwin has published a new book: The Sawtooth Slayer. It is available either as a Kindle book or a paperback. Here is the description:

April 2020, Twin Falls, Idaho. A serial killer is on the loose. A nameless man is kidnapping young women from their own homes, taking them out of the city to kill them before returning their bodies to random locations around the city. Detective Maria Gonzalez heads up the investigation but has very few leads to pursue. As time passes and fears rise that the killer might strike again with a fifth victim, Maria turns to Venator—an investigative genetic genealogy company—in the hope that they can identify the killer from his DNA alone before he has the chance to take yet another life. Despite her initial reticence to take on the company’s first ever live case, Madison Scott-Barnhart and her team in Salt Lake City agree to try to reveal the identity of this barbaric serial killer. In the midst of the global pandemic that has closed the Venator office and posed both personal and professional problems for Madison, time is running out on this case.

This is the second novel in the Venator Cold Case series. Although it can be enjoyed as a stand-alone story, for the best experience, begin your journey with The Chester Creek Murders.

It is available from Amazon (search for B0B8ZP2V6C) as well as other book stores.

The following announcement was written by TheGenealogist:

The Times Newspaper Historic Collection Launches on TheGenealogist

TheGenealogist launches fully searchable copies of The Times, to join its ever growing Newspapers and Magazines Collection. This release sees 3,129 editions from the 1870s decade join the many other newspaper publications already available to search on TheGenealogist. Keep a look out for further decades to be released in the coming months of this famous name-rich newspaper of record.

The Thunderer, as it was nicknamed, like many other newspapers carried Birth, Marriage and Death announcementsand so is a great resource for finding details of our ancestors and where they lived.

Discovering our forebears recorded in this newspaper may surprise some researchers. Inclusion in its pages may be because our ancestor was the victim or a witness to a crime. They may have worked as a police officer, lawyer or been a member of the court that had been a part of a legal case reported on by The Times.

Some ancestors may have warranted their name in print in this hallowed publication on being newly qualified and joining a professional body, for example The Royal College of Surgeons.

But it is not just the great and the good that appear in The Times as all sorts appear in its pages. For example the parties to divorce cases are ordinary people from across the country. You can read who was the petitioner, respondent and co-respondent, giving a researcher some useful information. Often included is the county in which the couple had lived and an occupation for the man.

For example, in the edition for Friday 10 June 1870 is a case where a man’s wife had left home to live with another. We discover that the petitioner was employed “at some works at Burslem, in Staffordshire'' while the co-respondent in the case was a grocer’s assistant.

Read TheGenealogist’s article: Times Past https://www.thegenealogist.co.uk/featuredarticles/2022/times-past-1629/

About TheGenealogist

TheGenealogist is an award-winning online family history website, who put a wealth of information at the fingertips of family historians. Their approach is to bring hard to use physical records to life online with easy to use interfaces such as their Tithe and newly released Lloyd George Domesday collections.

TheGenealogist’s innovative SmartSearch technology links records together to help you find your ancestors more easily. TheGenealogist is one of the leading providers of online family history records. Along with the standard Birth, Marriage, Death and Census records, they also have significant collections of Parish and Nonconformist records, PCC Will Records, Irish Records, Military records, Occupations, Newspaper record collections amongst many others.

TheGenealogist uses the latest technology to help you bring your family history to life. Use TheGenealogist to find your ancestors today!

Personal comment by Dick Eastman: I refuse to take any statin drug due to a personal history of undesirable side effects of the drug. This new announcement from 23andMe describes a possible diagnosis of side effects in advance of taking the drug.

The following announcement was written by 23andMe:

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has granted 23andMe 510(k) clearance for its pharmacogenetics report for the SLCO1B1 genetic variant to provide interpretive drug information for simvastatin. 

Simvastatin is a medication in the statin family of drugs, commonly prescribed to lower cholesterol to help reduce the risk of heart attack and stroke. In 2020, simvastatin was the second-most commonly prescribed statin and the thirteenth-most commonly prescribed medication in the U.S.

A variation of a particular gene, SLCO1B1, influences the body’s response to simvastatin. 

In certain ethnicities, up to 38% of people have a SLCO1B1 genotype that increases the possibility of experiencing side effects related to taking simvastatin, particularly statin-associated musculoskeletal symptoms risk.

In addition to providing interpretive drug information, the new FDA clearance also removes the requirement for confirmatory testing. 

“This is an important win for consumers, as they will have access to critical information on how they may respond to a commonly prescribed medication, based on their genetics,” said Noura Abul-Husn, M.D. Ph.D., Vice President of Genomic Health at 23andMe.

“A complete health picture requires a number of inputs, including genetics, which too often is left off the table in healthcare. With this clearance, we are continuing to champion access to actionable health information so that everyone can benefit from a personalized health care experience and avoid negative side effects of medications where possible.”

Note: This article is not about any of the "normal" topics of this newsletter: genealogy, history, current affairs, DNA, and related topics. However, thousands of genealogists are also frequent users of Google Docs so I am posting this brief article to inform them of recent upgrades:

The Google team has been hard at work polishing our favorite blank documents to look at, Google Docs. While some of the changes are merely cosmetic—I mean, look at all those pretty new icons in the menu—others added new functionality. And if, like most humans, you dismiss every notification for a new feature, you might have missed them.

So, whether you're a Google Docs power user or just a casual (no judgment!), dive into the most recent batch of features, and get a feel for how these Google Docs tips can improve your workflows.

Details may be found at: https://zapier.com/blog/google-docs-features/. 

I normally do not like to publish articles involving politics. However, in this case, the article revolves around the actions (or technically, the inactions) of the U.S. National Archives and Records Administation, a major supplier of genealogy information):

The National Archives is denying Republican accusations that its decision to refer Donald Trump’s handling of classified records to the Justice Department had anything to do with an inquiry from a top House Democrat.

House Republicans have been raising questions over the timing of the referral, which occurred on Feb. 9 — the same day House Oversight Committee Chair Carolyn Maloney (D-N.Y.) wrote to the agency to raise questions about Trump’s handling of sensitive documents that he retained at his Mar-a-Lago estate. But that timing is “entirely coincidental,” Acting National Archivist Debra Steidel Wall wrote in a letter to congressional Republicans on Tuesday.

The Archives’ inspector general operates with complete independence from the broader agency, Wall said, and did not receive Maloney’s letter, which was directed to the Archivist.

“At no time and under no circumstances were NARA officials pressured or influenced by Committee Democrats or anyone else,” Wall wrote.

Wall directed congressional inquiries about the ongoing investigation to DOJ, which is spearheading the probe into Trump’s handling of documents. DOJ had requested NARA “not share or otherwise disclose to others information related to NARA’s recovery of the 15 boxes at this time in order to protect the integrity of DOJ’s ongoing work,” Wall wrote.

You can read more in a rather lengthy article by Kyle Cheney and Nicholas Wu published in the Politico.com web site at: https://tinyurl.com/2p85eesv

(Continued from previous message)

The following announcement was written by Findmypast:

As the Christmas shopping season is soon to be upon us, perhaps it is time to remind people that there is no such thing as a "family" coat of arms. You will see ads on the web and in magazines as well as pushcart merchants in the malls selling this stuff. Yes, they will be happy to sell you an "authentic" reproduction of the Smith or other surname coat of arms, suitable for framing. They will also sell golf shirts embroidered with the same coat of arms or coffee cups with the same. 

(Insert the sound of a loud, obnoxious buzzer here.)

A typical (but bogus) coat-of-arms, probably belonging to this person:

Sorry folks, that stuff is totally bogus. Don't waste your money! The people selling that stuff are flim-flam artists. Ask them for documentation that the coat of arms they sell is, in fact, authorized for everyone with the same last name as your own. They won't be able to do so because that is not how coats of arms are issued.

Coats of arms are part of a system of heraldry or the display of armorial designs that goes back to the Middle Ages. The United States has no system of coats of arms. Awarding of coats of arms is done only in the British Isles, the former British Commonwealth nations, Europe, some countries in Europe, and a few countries in Asia. 

In the British Isles, the former British Commonwealth nations and most western European countries, coats of arms are only awarded to individuals. To be sure, another person (usually the oldest son) may be able to obtain permission to display the same coat of arms if he applies for it after the death of the original holder. Therefore, if you are the oldest son of the oldest son of the oldest son of the oldest son of the person originally awarded the coat of arms, you might be allowed to display the same coat of arms, after you have applied for the right to display it. 

A written application is required, and only one person is approved. Anyone else wanting to display the same coat of arms must wait for the death of the present holder and then apply himself. The actual rules for the use and display of coats of arms are a bit more complex than what I want to describe here, but suffice it to say that 99.9% of the purveyors of coat of arms reproductions ignore all those rules.

NOTE #1: If you have a certificate from the herald authority of the country involved, then you do have the authority to display the coat of arms. However, if you have such permission, I suspect you already know a great deal about this subject and probably have already skipped this article. For those without written authorization, I will caution you that displaying an unauthorized coat of arms as your own is a form of impersonation.

NOTE #2: There are some variations of these rules in a few European countries. The Netherlands has two parallel systems for coat of arms. Families of the nobility follow the above rules while medieval families of the merchant class developed a different system that can be passed from father to son without paperwork. Some eastern European families use a coat of arms system with somewhat different rules. However, the only place I know of that allows for coats of arms to be used by everyone of a certain surname is Japan. If you are a direct all-male descendant of a Samurai warrior, you can ignore this article. 

To see how widespread the "family coat of arms" business has become, go to any Web search engine and search for "your family coat of arms." For instance, you can search for "family coat of arms" on Google. You will find many Web sites advertising this schlock; many of them even claim that the products are "authentic." Well, the word "authentic" can be interpreted in multiple ways. Yes, the coat of arms in question probably is or was authentic for someone; but, I doubt if it is authentic for your use. 

It is illegal to conduct schemes or devices to obtain money through the U.S. mails by means of false representation. Indeed, anything sold to you as "your family's coat of arms" has been misrepresented. The legal citation is 39 U.S.C.93005. If you believe you have been the victim of a coat of arms scam, you can do something about it! If you purchased products that you feel did not live up to advertised claims, demand a refund! If your money is not returned within 30 days or so from a U.S. company, submit a complaint to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) Bureau of Consumer Protection at: ReportFraud.ftc.gov

The U.S. Postal Inspection Service will investigate any companies that use the U.S. mails to misrepresent mass-produced surname books or coats of arms. You can contact them at:

U.S. Postal Inspection Service
Consumer Protection Division
475 L'Enfant Plaza, SW
Washington, DC 20260-1100

A few letters of inquiry from the federal government will send a strong message to the people who produce products or services of questionable value. 

Finally, credit card companies are very active at consumer protection. If you used a credit card to pay for a product that is of questionable value and the company involved has refused to return the money, call the toll-free number shown on the back of your credit card and describe the problem to Customer Service. The credit card companies have much more leverage to obtain refunds than you do, and they move much more quickly than the government does.

Because of the extra protection offered by credit card companies, always make your online and offline purchases by credit card. Do not use cash, checks, money orders, or debit cards for online purchases; you will not enjoy the same level of protection as that provided by credit cards. Despite the "old wives' tales" that float around, credit cards are always the safest method of sending payments, both online and offline. (Debit cards are not true credit cards and may or may not have fraud protection. Check with your issuing bank for details.)

For more information about the proper use of coats of arms and other armorial designs, check out the following web sites:

The College of Arms is the official heraldic authority for England, Wales, Northern Ireland and much of the Commonwealth including Australia and New Zealand: http://www.college-of-arms.gov.uk.

The Heraldry Society exists to increase and extend interest in and knowledge of heraldry, armory, chivalry, genealogy and allied subjects: http://www.theheraldrysociety.com.

The Heraldry Society of Scotland promotes the study of heraldry and encourages its correct use in Scotland and overseas: http://www.heraldry-scotland.co.uk/ .

The Royal Heraldry Society of Canada or RHSC and its branches encourages, educates, and promotes the art and science of heraldry: http://www.heraldry.ca. 

I do have one word of advice: if your relative buys you a Christmas present that includes the "family's coat of arms," I suggest that you smile graciously and accept the gift. Don't break out laughing until you return to the privacy of your own home. After all, there is no sense in making fun of someone else's innocence.